Saturday, 10 December 2016

M5Journal: Planned approach for assessment and how it relates to teaching/learning theory.


My evolving project which is a hybrid MOOC has three learning environments. The FutureLearn (2015) MOOC environment, the face-to-face community meetings and a dedicated website for the learning group on WordPress called “Learning with MOOCs”. Overall, the principles of experiential learning and social constructivism are deployed in this hybrid course. The learner will develop his/her own research project proposal by following a step by step process over an 8-week period, a method consistent with the principle of experiential learning. Social constructivism, a theory which emphasizes the role of language and social interaction in development and learning is also used. Below I have described the different assessments that are planned and, for each set, I have linked it to the teaching and learning theory developed by Laurillard (2012), which incorporates experiential learning and social constructivism as well as other theories, and describes them in a comprehensive yet concise manner.
Assessment- Learning goals
As the adult lifelong learners are participating in a ‘free’ course during their ‘free’ time, it is important that they are clear on their motivation to join the learning community. Assessment activities will start with having learners clarify their personal learning goals at the outset (Week 0) and re-assessing their achievement at end of course (Week 8). In both instances they will compare personal goals with the set course goals.
Teaching/learning theory. This is aligned with Laurillard’s (2012) teaching principles and strategies “align goals, activities, assessment” specifically “draw on learners’ experiences to align their goals with the teacher’s” (p. 79).
Formative assessments- discussions and reflective journaling
As the course progresses there are weekly discussions in all three learning environments on content areas and on learning reflections. It is expected that the face-to-face learning environment and the dedicated website discussions will be most used as the learners will “know” each other and have established a level of trust between each other. By week 2 weekly reflective writing in e-journals is introduced to assist in metacognition.
Teaching/learning theory. This is aligned with Laurillard’s (2012) teaching principles and strategies “monitor alternative conceptions” especially “use formative assessment to make students’ thinking visible to themselves, their peers” (p. 79).
Formative Assessment-quizzes and exercises
To develop their research project proposal, each week step-by-step guidance is given and formative assessment such as online quizzes are available.  Exercises to draw out learners’ thinking on topics such as making a live presentation are provided in hand-outs to be completed individually. Learners are encouraged to participate in asynchronous discussions reflecting on their learning and this is repeated in the face-to-face sessions and dedicated group online discussions. Weekly uploading of their artifacts (draft documents, exercises) and their reflections on the same are to be included in their e-portfolios.
Summative assessment- draft summaries, peer reviews, self-assessments and quizzes
Learners prepare summaries of their research projects that are then peer reviewed to assess progress in Weeks 2 and 7. A course Quiz is included in Week 8. These are all contained within the MOOC learning environment. For the hybrid version additional opportunities to peer review summaries are offered in the face-to-face meetings and on the dedicated website. In additional summative assessments such as quizzes, e-portfolio self-assessment and peer-review self-assessment rubrics are included in the dedicated website.
Teaching/learning theory. This is aligned with Laurillard’s (2012) teaching principles and strategies “scaffold theory-based practice” specifically “simplify the task, so that the learner can manage components of the process and recognize when a fit with task requirements is achieved; design exercises that provide the meaningful instrinsic feedback that learners are able to interpret and use to revise their actions; create tasks and conditions that reveal student thinking; [and] give learners the means to build an external representation of their knowledge to share with others” (p. 79).
Assessments - metacognition
This course has a diversity of assessments conducted both on and off-line including: individual e-journaling on a weekly basis,  participating in three different learning spaces for discussions on content and reflections, sharing their summaries and conducting peer reviews and self-assessing their own peer reviews, summarizing main content and learning and comparing descriptions and highlighting differences with peers and with the larger group, and testing their knowledge through online quizzes.
Teaching/learning theory. This is aligned with Laurillard’s (2012) teaching principles and strategies of encouraging metacognition especially “encourage students to practice and discuss metacognitive practices; model the use of meta-cognitive strategies; encourage students to practice and discuss these strategies; engage students in grading their own and their peers’ performance; show students have different conceptualizations; and compare descriptions and highlight differences and inconsistencies” (p. 79).

References
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science. New York: Routledge.